Thursday, December 21, 2017

Administrative Corruption, Nepotism, Injustice and Discrimination in South Sudan


ABSTRACT:

This paper discusses military, police, prison, customs, wildlife, foreign services officers and public servants promotions, assignments and deployments system in South Sudan. The paper argues that since the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA 2005-2011) and Post-Referendum eras, promotions, assignments, deployments, recruitments, hiring and rehiring of organized force personnel, foreign services officers and public servants lack fairness, transparency and equity and this is one of the many reasons that led the country  into this current political and humanitarian crisis as well as culture of killings, rape of young girls, boys, women, and aid workers, land grabbing, looting of civilians’ properties with impunity, because Kiir, Gen. Malong, Gen. Achuil Tito and Jieng council of elders assigned and promoted illiterate, unqualified, incompetent, untrained, and inexperienced close relatives, son-in-laws, daughter-in-laws, and tribesmen/women in important and sensitive government institutions to run these government offices as Animal Farms.

The culture of discriminations, injustice, unpunished crimes committed by SPLA soldiers, killing, rape and land grabbing of non-Dinka in their areas, dated back to the liberation time and it is not something that started under Kiir, but during the liberation era. It is said that, the SPLM commanders and leaders brainwashed many young persons whom they recruited to ignore the ethnics of their culture all in the name of freedom from Khartoum. An independent eye witness recall one of the commanders in the Rumbek area who started attacking unarmed civilians even though he new it ran against the ethnics of the Dinka law never to slay an unarmed person and similar events of Rumbek are been repeated in the independent South Sudan. Kiir has just perpetuated it and developed it to high level with the support of Mathiang Aynor, Gelweng and Dothubany.

Further, it argues that the current dysfunctional state of affairs in South Sudan is a clear evidence of a mess created by Kiir, Jieng council of elders (JCE), Mathiang Aynor, Gelweng and Dothubany. Finally, it sheds light on study carried out from June to December 2017. As this is work in progress, the study faced some limitations in accessing complete data on some individual officers and foreign services officers.

The study shows that, there are injustices, discriminations, and lack of fairness and equity in recruitments, hiring, rehiring, promotions, assignments, and deployments of non-Dinka in government institutions. The paper offers concrete way forward and it commences with promotions, recruitments, hiring and rehiring policy in the Post-CPA and Referendum periods.

Only a year or two after the CPA came into effect, Gurtong online newspaper has published an article on the unfair distribution of positions in the Ministry of Justice under Michael Makuei. Gurtong made it very clear that, there was a dominance of Dinka in all Southern Sudan government institutions as well as organized forces. Therefore, knowledge of this has been going on for a long time, but nothing was done or taken seriously by the international donors, African Union (AU) and Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD). The fear of dominance by the Dinka in the liberation movement was clear in the proposals of federalism coming from 64 ethnic intellectuals.

In the Post-CPA period, the promotions, recruitments, hiring, rehiring policy was designed to favor SPLA/M carders of two ethnicities of Dinka and Nuer. Within SPLA/M non-Dinka carders were deliberately deprived of promotions, deployments and assignments and most were placed on non-active lists, while their Dinka cohorts were promoted to high ranks and assigned to lead important and sensitive organized forces departments in non-Dinka states. Dinka government in Juba is using similar tactic of former Sudan-suppresses opponents specially Equatorians the fathers of federalism and Kokora-It is payback time.

Below are some examples to illustrate administrative corruption, nepotism, discriminations and injustice against non-Dinka in organized forces, foreign services and public services. This same discriminatory policy under the Khartoum era that is, promoting northerners in higher military and public services positions over competent southerners is what led in part to the mutinies and liberation wars of 1956 and 1983. Hence no surprise what occurred in the South. Same discriminatory patterns prevailed. The 2016 South Sudan Police Service promotions process was planned, and doctored at Gen. Achuil Tito, Chief of South Sudan Police residence in Juba.

Maj. Gen. Salah Samsona was born in Juba, and citizen of Central Equatoria State (CES). Gen. Samsona is a graduate of a Conflict Resolution program and School of Management, school of law, Omduraman Al-Ahlia Universities (OAU) and Sudanese Police Academy. Gen. Samsona was forced into early retirement and placed on non-active list, while illiterate Majak Akec Malok without formal education and police training was promoted three times in a short period of time from Colonel to Brigadier, Major General, finally to Lt. General and assigned as Director of Nationality, Passports, and Immigration. On the other hand, highly qualified, experienced, competent, well trained and skillful non-Dinka officers who held similar positions in the former Sudan’s Directorate of Nationality, Passports and Immigration were either demoted, depraved promotions, assignments and deployments or placed on non-active list.

Moreover, Gen. Salah Samsona is same cohort 47as Lt. Gen. Syed Chawul Lom. Both officers worked in Khartoum for many years where Gen. Chawul was dismissed three times for breached of police work ethics and conflict of interest. During the CPA period, both Generals were reinstated into South Sudan police services, and Gen. Chawul was promoted to rank of Chief of police while Gen. Samsona with strong academic background in policing, law, conflict resolutions, and management and experience was place on non-active list (see the 2005-2016 South Sudan Police Service Promotion Lists).   

Atem Moral is citizen of Jonglei State, SPLA soldier with no knowledge and experience and skills in policing. As a result of administrative corruption and nepotism Gen. Achuil promoted Moral to Major General and assigned him as Dean of South Sudan Police College in Rajaf, to replace Major General Martin Wani. Gen. Wani is well qualified, experience, professional Sudan Police Academy with many graduate and post graduate degrees in policing, security and legal studies. These practices of Kiir’s government explain why South Sudan Police system is not efficient, and corrupt and the police are using color of their authorities to kill, terrorize, rap, and arrest non-Dinka and detained them at South Sudan National Security (SSNS). The current detainees at the SSNS are all non-Dinka mostly from Equatoria States and the there is no one detainee from Kiir’s home State of Warrap and JCE States (See detainees list of period of 2015-2017). 

Maj.Gen. Rhabi E. Mujung was born in Juba, and citizen of (CES). Gen. Mujung is a graduate of School of Sciences Management with emphasis in Business, University of Juba, South Sudan; Sudanese Military Academy; the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst (RMAS) in London, U.K. Gen. Mujung was a classmate and roommate of King Abdullah II of Jordan. He holds Certificates and Diplomas in Standard Military Course (SMC), and Regular Career Course (RCC) and Certificate in senior military Command and Leadership from the US-African Strategic Research Centre. Gen. Mujung is well-respected senior military officer who commanded several fronts during the war liberation and by far is the most qualified, experienced and skillful SPLA officer, but as a non Dinka he was deprived of promotions and benefits such as vehicle and others for over 10 years, even though he is an SPLA officer fought in Southern and Eastern Sudan bushes, while illiterate Paul Malong without formal education and military training was promoted to Lt. General and Chief of Staff of SPLA to preside over qualified, competent, experienced, skillful and senior non Dinka Officers (The 2005-2017 SPLA Promotions List).

Brigadier Joseph Kornelio is a citizen of Western Bahr Al-Ghazal and member of Fertit ethnic group. Brig. Kornelio is a graduate of Sudanese Military Academy 1978, cohort 27. Brigadier Kornelio is very senior and highly qualified having the rank of Brigadier, this is an example of a non-Dinka highly qualified, but reinstated at lower rank despite his extensive and outstanding military career experience.

Similarly Col. Juwang Taktak, is a member of Murle ethnic group. Col. Taktak is a graduate of Sudanese Military Academy in Khartoum in 1988/cohort 38. Col. Taktak
was reinstated at the rank of Colonel, this is another example of discrimination.
Brigadier. Oben George, is a citizen of Upper Nile State and member of Shilluk ethnic group. Brig. George is a graduate of Sudanese Military Academy in Khartoum in 1981/cohort 30.

Brigadier. Obour Chol, is a citizen of Upper Nile State and member of Shilluk ethnic group. Brig. Chol is a graduate of Sudanese Military Academy in 1981/cohort 30.Both Brigadiers George and Chol are very seniors, highly qualified officers than Paul Malong and James Ajongo, the current Chief of Staff. Both Malong and Ajongo experiences and academic backgrounds cannot match Brigadiers’ experiences and skills and will never come close to these non-Dinka senior officers.

But the worst case of all is William Philip Subek. Officer Subek is a citizen of CES.  Equatoria State. Officer Subek is a graduate of Sudanese Military Academy, reinstated in the organized forces in South Sudan, then demoted to rank of Sergeant, while his Dinka cohorts and illiterate Paul Malong and others such as Gordon Buay were promoted to full Generals, assigned and posted to D.C., as Deputy Head of Mission. Buay holds B.A., in legal studies from Carleton University in Canada, and never had any professional job in Canada as well as one day military training.

Both Dr. James Alphonse and Dr. Lado Luate are citizens of CES, and graduates of School of medicine and Sudanese Military Academy. Both Doctors were placed on the non-active list without assignments in time country though there is a need of well qualified and experienced medical doctors. Dr. Alphonse and Dr. Luate’s junior Dinka officers were assigned to take charge and be responsible in the military hospital in Juba.  For further details about discrimination and injustice within the organized forces, please, consult the attached promotion lists.

Similarly, most of public service senior positions are filled in by unqualified Dinka and well-trained and competent non-Dinka lawyers and judges are either fired for no legal reasons, deprive promotions and assignments.

Dr. Sam Taban, citizen of (CES). He holds Ph.D., in International Law (I/L) from Poland and worked abroad for many years  and returned to help rebuilding broken legal system in South Sudan. Dr. Taban returned to South Sudan and joined Ministry of legal Affairs in 2011 and dismissed early this year 2017.

Justice, Jeremiah Swaka, is a citizen of CES. Justice Swaka holds LLM, and law Degrees from University of Khartoum, and M.A., in Conflict Resolutions from University of Juba. Justice Swaka was a senior judge in Southern Sudan in 1980s and Khartoum in 1990s as well as legal Advisor to Sudan Council of Churches in Khartoum in 2000s. Like Dr. Taban and Dr. Gerey Raimondo, Justice Swaka was dismissed early this year for no reason. Unfortunately, their dismissal occurred in a time where broken legal system in the country requires their expertise.

Ambassador Francis F. Nazario is a citizen of Easter Equatoria State (EES), and a member of Acholi ethnic group. Amb. Nazario holds Ph.D., and M.A., in Political Sciences from France and B.A., from Khartoum University. Amb. Nazario was South Sudanese Deputy Head of Mission in New York, was fired and replaced by cook helper related to Kirr.   

To be fair, and to its credit, Juba regime in fact did promote some non-Dinka loyalists, political disciples of JCE, and other Judases of injustice to high ranks and senior political positions. The overall tactics and strategy of loyalists’ promotion is to suppress their intuitions, silence and buy their hearts through appointments to conceal the regime’s rape of foreign aid workers, land grabbing crimes, killing campaign against farming communities in Equatoria states and other parts of the country.  The promotions and appointments of non-Dinka loyalists and political disciples of JCE are meaningless if injustice, discrimination, and administrative corruption, domestic terror campaigns and land grabbing still continue.

The regime placed political disciples of JCE in key positions in order to protect the regime’s national and international images, as well as to protect JCE interests in the non-Dinka States. As John Isbister, the Canadian economist, argues in his book”Promises Not Kept, Poverty and the Betrayal in 3rd World Development” the former colonial systems sent sons of African middle classes to study in the U.K., France, Belgium and Portugal and the purpose was to condition them and later send back to Africa in the Post-Independence era to replace colonial masters/mistresses and to protect the latter’s interests in Africa (Isbister, 2006).

However, the good news according to the African liberation bible is that, some loyalists have realized that the era of self-interests and personal gains are coming to an end and change of hearts is a must, and as a result they formed military resistance and political opposition groups to effect change in the country. On another hand, some loyalists and political disciples of JCE still maintain their positions within the corrupt system as well as turned blind eyes to injustice, discrimination, administrative corruption, inequality and the policy of Dinka tribal dominance Kiir’s regime in South Sudan.

Here is a list of some promoted loyalists in the CPA and Post-Referendum eras, both non-Dinka and Dinka and JCE political disciples who saw the point of Isbister’s arguments and realized they were being used to further the colonialists’ agenda and decided to form opposition against Juba regime: Dr. Riek Machar, Angelina Teny, Gen. Thomas Cyrilio, Gov. Joseph Bakasoro, Dr. Lam Akol, Paul Malong and Suzanne Jambo, former SPLM National Secretary for External Relations. In e-mails exchange with diaspora members, Ms. Jambo had this to say: 
Landi and the good reverend Andrew Henry, Nyatom et el,
You guys are so tired of washing dishes and doing dirty manual work in Europe & USA etc you think your best bet is an 11th hour wake up call to 'keyboard unguided missiles throwing serve' your nation after 15th Dec 2013. 

If you google some of us, you will see our remarkable career history - some of us are here purely to serve our Nation. So please don't slither and salivate over nothing. More is yet to come brethren! 

Now the former loyalists are fighting the injustice, discrimination, promotion, assignment, and deployment deprivations policy of Juba regime.

The injustice, discrimination, promotion, assignment, and deployment deprivations also include non-Dinka officer graduates of Sudanese military, police, prison, customs and wildlife academies and universities who have served under the national government of former Sudan with competency, efficiency and effectiveness have been reinstated and integrated into South Sudan organized forces at lower ranks, while their peers of the same class were promoted to ranks as high as Major General, Lt. General, Director and Director General.  The integrity of these services and the morale of the officers are threatened by a situation where officers who have been active in duty have been left behind, whilst those who have been out of service for many years or even abroad are reinstated and promoted to high ranks and assigned in high positions.

The issues of promotion, assignment, deployment deprivations were addressed to President and the First South Sudanese Minister of Interior, late Alison Magaya many times, but all efforts yield no positive results. Additionally, there are no mechanisms for countering such injustices and any move to resolve it is blocked by Dinka Chief of Police and the Minister as well as all complains landed in the hands of Dinka.

Most of Dinka officers who were members of organized forces in the former Sudan and some have lived in the Western countries for many years with their knowledge of the organized forces system forgotten and out of date were reinstated, promoted, assigned high positions and deployed in important and sensitive organized forces Directorates; meanwhile, outstanding non-Dinka officers with excellent performance records, excellent academic credentials and strong experience are overlooked in promotions and deprived from constitutional rights as well as assignments and deployments.

Unfairness in the reinstatement and promotion process for the South Sudanese officers has demoralized the effectiveness of organized forces.  An inequitable environment for job security and advancement in the service results in organized forces incompetence, inaction and corruption, rather than motivating officers to work hard to deter and prevent crime, such as the high rate of killings in Juba and other parts of South Sudan.  Officers have a right to ask why priority for reinstatement and promotion is being given to officers who spent many years abroad and promotions of one ethnicity of Dinka only.

Promotions, assignments, deployments, and postings are designed to serve interests and benefit of JCE members, while demotions and non-active list for non-Dinka especially, the Equatorians, Fertit groups and Nuer. Demotion, deprivation of promotions, assignments, deployments and disarming non-Dinka during Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards program (IDDRS) was a sign of one ethnicity hegemony and domination (See 2010-2011 Report of Lakes State Investigation Commission).

The Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards program (IDDRS) failed, because the Southern Sudan government plan under Kiir and JCE leadership was to disarmed non-Dinka only, armed Dinka and permit their cattle under security protections to graze in the land of farming communities in Equatoria State resulted in inter-communal conflicts. The policy of arming one ethnicity is the source of current violence, fighting and killings in Lakes region which left at least 170 dead. This is evidence of arming one ethnic group in Lakes, Warrap Northern Bhar Al-Ghazal and Jonglei against the others (Reuters News: December 12th, 2017).  

For instance, below are some reasons why DDR failed in Southern Sudan.
Yet the participants from Wau and Aweil, who began the process [DDR] as late as mid-2010, appear equally ineligible. Instead, the verification process is flawed at multiple levels.
The verification problem persists today. Despite calls from the international community for better accountability, and with the Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Commission (SSDDRC) apparently unwilling to challenge the SPLA on candidate selection, there remains no external, independent verification process. As a result, there are few disincentives for SPLA state commanders to falsify information or use the DDR programme as a kind of social service to assist selected individuals who have already returned to civilian life (Small Arm Survey, p.7&8, Number 17, May 2017).

The deprivation of promotion, assignment, and deployment study shows that, JCE nepotism, administration corruption, discrimination and inequality is targeting well qualified and trained, experienced, skillful and competent non-Dinks officers in all organized forces as well as across government institutions. For instance; the recent unfair dismissal of Mr. Avelino Andruga, Head Teacher of Rumbek National Secondary School is another targeted non-Dinka qualified public servant (Ministerial Order Number 32/2017, November 30th, 2017).

The purpose of this study is to help the international community, Troika, IGAD, AU and Members of Opposition negotiation teams with valuable and substantive evidence of discrimination, administrative corruption and injustice in the current security sectors, organized forces and public services in South Sudan. It is also clear that, the country was built on the dominance of one ethnic group-the Dinka to control administrative, economic, military and political powers. Furthermore, this may explain why Nuer were targeted in the senseless December 2013 senseless civil war, because Nuer is perceived as a threat to Dinka hegemony, defeats JCE Master Plan and now the system turns against federalist supporters-the Equatorians.

This current injustice and discrimination in South Sudanese organized forces and public service serve as catalyst for future instability and spoiler for peace agreement implementation, nation and state building, peace building, power sharing and power division unless injustice, discrimination and deliberate demotions of non-Dinka issue should be address and give full attention in the current peace revitalization talks in Addis.

The paper argues that, the current peace revitalization in progress is litmus test for the stakeholders to consider the following issues: SPLA and all organized forces should be dismantle and new ones should be establish and rebuild from bottom up, new system of recruitment should be establish and must be based on entrance exams and merits to avoid future political crisis as well as administrative corruption, nepotism, injustice and discrimination in public services and organized forcesAs some in the international community such as Hilde Johnson believes firmly that, the current war grew out of apolitical crisis and turned ethnic (Johnson, 2016). My paper shows that is only part of the story. It also grows out of an ethnic crisis in which one group wishes to dominate all the 60 ethnic groups.

The way forward

The administrative corruption, injustice, demotion and deprivation of promotions, assignments, and deployments are deliberately planned under the JCE Master Plan (See The 2015 Dinka Development Plan (DDP)), and for South Sudan to move forward, the peace revitalization process must factor into future Peace talks and agreements the following:

Political system: urgency to draft New Federal Constitutions, and dissolve current parliament.
Requirement to be an M.P.: Minimum: High School Certificate.

Electoral Constituencies: Redrawing Electoral constituencies map base on population’s size.

Council of States (120 Members): Its Members should be elected and in an event of appointment by President, it’s members should be representatives of 66 ethnic group. For instance, each ethnic group should have 2 members in the Council of States
Requirement: Minimum: High School Certificate.

Security Sector: dismantle current SPLA, security organs and organized forces and rebuild and develop national South Sudanese Army Forces (SSAF), police, prison, customs, wildlife, and other security organs that reflect national character. Recruitment should be based on quotas system, entrance exams, medical fitness, background checks as well as merit. The mandate of SSAF is to defend the country and it’s Constitution. Police and other sectors are for internal security only.
Requirement: Minimum: High School Certificate.
Promotions: Should based on performances, medical fitness, practical and written exams.  
Public Services Recruitment: should be based quotas system on the three regions.
Requirement: Minimum: High School Certificate

Foreign Services Recruitment: should be based on quotas system of the three regions.
Requirement: Minimum: University Degree, and M.A., and foreign languages is an assessed

Governance system: Should be based on Confederation of the three regions of Equatoria, Bahr Al-Ghazal and Upper Nile. The Confederation system should be based on a consultative constitutional forums to decide Confederation, but Swiss model of Confederation is the most suitable for South Sudan. The Constitution Review should be based on the South African process that lasted over 2 years.

Negotiators should make sure that element of revitalization of peace agreement must include SPLA and other security sectors restructuring and complete rebuilding new national organized forces, otherwise South Sudan will revisit ordeal of July 2016.

Stability of the country and peace agreement implementation will only hold when newly trained, qualified, experienced and competent personnel are recruited and composition of new South Sudan defense forces reflects representatives of 60 ethnicity.

South Sudan has 60 ethnic groups (The House of Nationalities,2002, p.19,&53) and it is not fair for groups such as Swiss peace, United States Institute of Peace (USIP), Chatham House UK based Think Tank and other INGOs that keep promoting one sided ethnic view on the current political crisis in South Sudan rather than promoting inclusiveness. Through their consultative meetings, conferences and interns programs. The current behavior and practices of these groups are helping Dinka hegemony and domination in the country.

This past summer of 2017, Swiss peace organization hosted conference on South Sudan and invited only members of one ethnic group to participated in the conference in Switzerland, similarly, USIP hosted two interns one is Dinka and Nuer for couple months in the U.S., and Chatham House hosted several consultative meetings on the current political situations, but only extended invitation to members of one ethnic group to represent the country. I do hope Swiss peace; USIP, Chatham and other groups will not transfer Juba regime’s unfairness policy to international space as well as refrain from promoting one ethnic group through their intern programs, conference, and consultative meetings and be on the right side of history.

What Should Transitional Government Do?

A Transitional government should reflect national characters of the House of Nationalities and should be led by the small ethnic groups. The small ethnic group should choose suitable servant leader for leadership to govern the country.

Old Guards

Kiir, Riek, Igga, Gai and anyone who was part (served in any capacities) of post CPA and Post referendum (2005-2018) must not be part of transitional government, because they the very ones who created the mess South Sudan is in today and current political and humanitarian crisis. They cannot offer anything new to move the country forward. 

Opposition Groups
Old opposition groups must be excluded from a transitional government; however, oppositions may negotiate for future balance government under the leadership of small ethnic groups.
Opposition groups should build political parties, civic education and prepare the country for future General Elections.
How to defeat government
For the opposition to be effect and effect change in the country, they should coordinate their attacks simultaneously. For instance, Lam and Johnson can operate from north east, IO and Abdul bagi from north west, and TC and IO in Great Equatoria. The coordinated and simultaneously attacks will put government under sieges and will provide oppositions with upper hands in the negotiation. 
Education
A transitional government should reform education system and adhered to one curriculum. Transitional government should increase education and health budget from 7% t0 35%.
Public and Foreign Services
Public and foreign services of transitional under the leadership of small ethnic group should be balance and should reflect national characters of the House Nationalities.
Ambassadors and foreign Services Officers
Transitional government should reduce diplomatic missions to 25 embassies and reduce ambassadors 125 to 50 ambassadors. Ambassador’s appointment must be subject to new parliament confirmation. 
Ambassadors and Foreign Services Officers must be college and university graduates and must meet job merits.
Tax System
Tax collections should under state authorities and State shall only remits federal government percentage. Higher percentage should be allotted to state government for services.  
Security
Security, police, prison, wildlife, military and other organize forces recruitments must be based on experiences, merits, and strong academic background. The highly qualified officers graduates of police, prison, wildlife and military colleges and universities should be selected to form recruitment boards (boards for officers and soldiers and promotions) and to restructure and organize organizer forces according to international system in transitional period. Board should reflect national characters of the House of Nationalities
Police
Police in a transitional government period must be under state authorities- i.e. each State and County should have their own police. The recruitments must be under State authorities. The members of County and State police must be State citizens
Police, Prison, Custom, Wildlife and Military college’s Deans, Police Chief and Directors of Directorate 

Police, prison, Custom, Wildlife and Military College Deans must be organizer forces college graduate and university degree is an asset


Judiciary Reform
The current judiciary requires complete reform specially in the area of land and property law. The new reform should address the burning issues of land grabbing from their rightful owners. The leadership of transitional and future governments must enact legislation and law that will facilitate return of grabbed lands to their rightful owners. The land issue in South Sudan is a time bombs.  

Transitional government should establish Tribunal and Mobile Courts to persecute land grabbing criminals and compensate the rightful owners for their lost.    
Retirement Trust Fund: With the support of international donors, the trust fund should be established to pension off unqualified SPLA soldiers and officers in all organizers forces. The trust fund should pay for the following: health, education, monthly salary and retraining programs.  This trust fund should be managed properly to avoid recurrence of new rebellion by former unqualified SPLA soldiers and officers.
Failure of mediators to include above issues in the current peace talks and political settlements; and transitional and future governments in South Sudan to address these issues in new Constitution that is approve by the grass-root (in holistic manner- from bottom-up and top-bottom), the country may be face political unrest and recurrences of humanitarian crisis in the near future. 

In a nutshell, the mess South Sudan is in today and current political and humanitarian crisis are result of unfairness policy, the one ethnic group domination, control of administrative, economic, military and political powers, and administrative corruption, discrimination, injustice and nepotism. 

Peoples of South Sudan fought successive Khartoum's regimes, because of unfairness, injustice, inequality, favoritism, preferential treatments and discrimination in the old Sudan, and some of South Sudan military, Police, Prison, customs and wildlife officers are experiencing similar administrative corruption, injustice, inequality, nepotism, and discrimination, nepotism, favoritism and preferential treatments in the current South Sudanese system. Peace without justice and equality is not a peace, it is tribalism. 

© Hüstin Läkü,Sr

Is a native South Sudanese, and educated in South Sudan, Sudan, Egypt, Germany and Switzerland. His current research topic Title: Evaluating South Sudan Governance: From Perspective of Federated Forms and/or Devolution. Moreover, Hüstin has lectured on Sudanese issues in the United States, Canadian universities, the Canadian military academy in Kingston, Rome, Berlin, Innsbruck, Geneva, London, Slovenia and Amsterdam. Hüstin is recipient of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr life time Dream keeper Award, and Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Model for Humanitarian. He speaks Arabic, French, and Deutsch and read and write Greek and Hebrew. 

Study Results of promotions of military, police, prison, customs, wildlife and foreign services (Source: Presidential Decrees 2005-2017).



LIST OF NON ACTIVE NON DINA OFFICERS FORCED TO RETIREMENT BY JCE GOVERNMENT



NON ACTIVE LIST
Domotions are deigned to get rid of non-Dinka officers with high qualifications, experienced,skillful, competent and  strong academic backgrounds
Non Active list is designed for non-Dinka officers with high qualifications, strong academic backgrounds and competency
Non Active list is designed for non-Dinka officers who are not members of SPLA,i.e. did not fought, but served under Khartoum regime.
IRREGULARITIES AND INCONSISTENCES IN PROMOTION
Promotions are in consistence with cohort number and graduation year, E.G. senior non-Dinka officers are demoted at lower rank while SPLA Dinka members are promoted to high ranks, assigned and deployed.
Promotions are designed to benefit officers of one ethnic group and SPLA officers
LIST OF ACTIVE AND NON ACTIVE OFFICERS NON DINKA DEPRIVED OF PROMOTIONS AND FORCED TO EARLY RETIREMENT



NOTE
















A/IGP:  Assistant Inespector General for Administration of Police South Sudan Service
A/CID: Assistant Criminal Investigation Departement
DG: Director General
Non Active List
















16 out of 40 non-Dinka officers are
 citizens of CES, EES, and WES States
40%
12 out of 40 non-Dinka officers are citizens of CES
30%
3 out of 40 non-Dinka officers are citizens of WES
7.50%
1 out of 40 non-Dinka officer is citizen of EES
2.50%
1 out of 40 non-Dinka officer is female
2.50%
1 out of 40 non-Dinka officers on non active list Ph.D.,holder
2.50%
COHORT: inconsistance in promotions













Members of the same cohort 44 non-Dinka Officers are either demoted  or promoted at lower rank, while Dinka officers promoted to high ranks
Members of the same cohort 47 non-Dinka Officers are either demoted  or promoted at lower rank, while Dinka officers promoted to high ranks
PROMOTIONS
















3 out of 40 non-Dinka officers deprivate of promotions
Promotions are not consistence with cohort number and graduation year, E.G. senior non-Dinka officers are demoted at lower rank while SPLA Dinka members are promoted to high ranks, assigned and deployed.
Based on figure above, promotions are designed to eliminate non Dinka officers who are citizens of of the following States: CES, EES, WES, UNS(Shilluk, Nuer and Murle), WBG (Fertit groups), and NBG (Jurchol)
Promotions are designed to get rid of non-Dinka officers with high qualifications, experienced,skillful, competent and  strong academic backgrounds
Non Active list is designed for non-Dinka officers with high qualifications, strong academic backgrounds and competency
Non Active list is designed for non-Dinka officers who are not members of SPLA,i.e. did not fought, but served under Khartoum regime.

Lt. Colonel to Brigadier General
PROMOTIONS
%
10 out of 29 Police officers promoted are Dinka



35%





10 out of 29 Police officers promoted are University graduates



35%





8 out of 29 Police officers promoted are Police Academy graduates


28%





5 out of 29 Police officers promoted are UNS (Nuer)
17%
4 out of 29 Police officers promoted are citizens of CES
14%
3 out of 29 Police officers promoted are  citizens of Lakes
10%
3 out of 29 Police officers promoted are  citizens of Abyei
10%
3 out of 29 Police officers promoted are citizens of WES
10%
3 out of 29 Police officers promoted are Medical Doctors



10%





3 out of 29 Police officers promoted are not Police Academy graduates (SPLA)
10%
2 out of 29 Police officers promoted are citizens of WBG
7%
2 out of 29 Police officers promoted are citizens of Warrap
7%
2 out of 29 Police officers promoted are citizens of Jonglei
7%
2 out of 29 Police officers promoted ECON graduates
7%
1 out of 29 Police officer promoted is citizens of NBG
4%
1 out of 29 Police officer promoted is citizens of EES
4%
1 out of 29 Police officer promoted is Med Assistant
4%
1 out of 29 Police officers promoted one passed police academy qualifying entrance exam and graduated
4%





1 out of 29 Poice officers promoted one is Law graduate
4%
1 out of 29 Police officers promoted one is Wildlife graduate
4%
1 out of 29 Police officers promoted one is Commces graduate
4%
IRREGULARITIES AND INCONSISTENCES IN PROMOTION
Promotions process are inconsistance with cohort number and graduation year, E.G. senior non-Dinka officers are demoted at lower rank while SPLA Dinka members are promoted to high ranks, assigned and deployed.
Promotions are designed to benefit officers of one ethnic group and SPLA officers
NEPOTISM
Garang Akuel Diing Dinka officer related (Sons in law) to South Sudan Police Chief Lt. Gen Achuil Tito






©Laku's Research Centre 2017










PROMOTIONS: Colonel to Brigadier
%
40 out of 95 Police officers promoted are Dinka
42%
17 out of 95 Police officers promoted are Nuer
18%
1 out of 95  Police officer promoted is citizens of CES
1%
1 out of 95 Police officer promoted is a citizen of EES
18%
IRREGULARITIES AND INCONSISTENCES IN PROMOTION
Promotions process are inconsistance with cohort number and graduation year, E.G. senior non-Dinka officers are demoted at lower rank while SPLA Dinka members are promoted to high ranks, assigned and deployed.
Promotions are designed to benefit officers of one ethnic group and SPLA officers
NEPOTISM
GENDER
ZERO
©Laku's Research Centre 2017













Colonel to Major General


PROMOTIONS
%


20 out of 35 Police officers promoted  are Dinkas
57%

only 9 out 35 Police officers promoted are graduates of Police Academy
26%

5 out of 35 Police officers promoted  are citizens of Warrap State
14%

6 out of 35 Police officers promoted are citizens of Jonglei State (Dinka)
17%

4 out of 35 Police officers promoted  are citizens of Lakes State
12%

4 out of 35 Police officers promoted  are citizens of CES (Bari group)
12%

4 out of 35 Police officers promoted are citizens of WES State
12%

2 out of 35 Police officers promoted  are citizens of Jonglei State (Nuer)
6%

1 out of 35 Police officers promoted is citizen of Uppler Nile State (Shilluk)
3%

1 out of 35 Police officers promoted  is citizen of WBG  State (Fertit group)
3%

1 out of 35 Police officers promoted is citizen of NBG State (Jurchol)
3%

1 out of 35 Police officers promoted  has Med Degree and Police Academy graduate
3%

1 out of 35 Police officers promoted  has holds Ph.D., and Police Academy graduate
3%

1 out of 35 Police officers promoted was militia affiliate to SPLA
3%


IRREGULARITIES AND INCONSISTENCES IN PROMOTION


Promotions process are inconsistance with cohort number and graduation year, E.G. senior non-Dinka officers are demoted at lower rank while SPLA Dinka members are promoted to high ranks, assigned and deployed.

Promotions are designed to benefit officers of one ethnic group


NEPOTISM


3 Dinka Officers are related (Son in law) to South Sudan Police Chief Lt. Gen Achuil Tito









Mony Deng is brother to Lt. Gen. Peing Deng Kuol, former Police Chief and associated with Gen. Achuil Tito








Mony Deng was promoted during the time of Lt.Gen. Kuol and Gen. Tito.









Gen. Peing Kuol is half brother of Dr. Francis Deng, Member of South Sudan National Dialogue





















GENDER

ZERO


©Laku's Research Centre 2017












PROMOTIONS: Brigadier General to Major General
%
11 out of 19 Police officers promoted are Dinka
59%
12 out of 19 Police officers promoted are not Police Academy graduates (SPLA)
63%
10 out of 19 Police officers promoted  are citizens of Jonglei
53%
6 out of 19 Police officers   promoted  are Police and Prison Academy graduates
32%
2 out of 19 Police officers promoted  are citizens of Warrap
11%
2 out of 19 Police officers promoted  are citizens of CES
11%
1 out of 19 Police officers promoted is a citizen of WBG State (Fertit)
5%
1 out of 19 Police officers promoted  is a citizen of EES
5%
1 out of 19 Police officers  promoted  is a citizes of WES
5%
1 out 19 Police officer promoted  holds Law Degree and Police Academy graduate
5%
IRREGULARITIES AND INCONSISTENCES IN PROMOTION
Promotions process are inconsistance with cohort number and graduation year, E.G. senior non-Dinka officers are demoted at lower rank while SPLA Dinka members are promoted to high ranks, assigned and deployed.
Promotions are designed to benefit officers of one ethnic group and SPLA officers
NEPOTISM
Kuir Thon Arok: 
Reinstated and promoted to Major General in a short period while his non Dinka cohort were not reinstated.
Restatement policy targeted Dinka only.   
GENDER
ZERO
©Laku's Research Centre 2017















ILLEGAL PROMOTIONS FROM 2nd LIEUTENNAT TO LIEUTENNANT GENERAL




NOTE
All Officers are Dinka
100%
PROMOTIONS
5 out 5 Dinka Police officers are not Career officers
80%
5 out 5 Dinka Police officers are not graduates of Police Academy
80%
1 out of 5 Dinka Police officer promoted from Colonel to Lientennant  General
20%
2 out of 5 Dinka Police officer promoted from Lientennant Colonel to Brigadier General
40%
1 out of 5 Dinka Police officer promoted from Major to Brigadier General
20%
1 out of 5 Dinka Police office is promoted 1st Lt to Colonel
20%
Promotion is designed for Dinka officers to hold important and sensitive police departments without experience and ski
OUTCOME OF ILLEGAL PROMOTIONS:
Administrative Corruption, ineffectivness of police service
High rate of crimes in the country
Majak Akec Malok
Was promoted three times in short period from Colonel to Brigadier General and finally to Lieutennant General
Was assigned Director of Nationalities, Passports, and Immigrations, while
While well trained,highly qualified, experienced, competent, skillful  police academy graduate were demoted, laid off and placed on non active list
©Laku's Research Centre 2017








LIST OF DINKA OFFICERS PROMOTED TWICE AND TRIPLE TIMES IN SHORT PERIOD OF TIME








PROMOTIONS: Double and Triple promotions
%


15 out of 34 Police officers promoted are Dinka
44%

9 out of 34 Police officers promoted are citizens o CES
26%

8 out of 34 Police officers promoted are citizens of WES
24%

6 out of 34 Police officers promoted are citizens of Lakes State
18%

5 out of 34 Police officers promoted are not Police Academy graduates (SPLA)
15%

4 out of 34 Police officers promoted are citizens of Warrap State
12%

3 out of 34 Police officers promoted are citizens of Jonglei State
9%

1 out of 34 Police officers promoted is a citizen of NBG State (Dinka)
3%


IRREGULARITIES AND INCONSISTENCES IN PROMOTION




Promotions process are inconsistance with cohort number and graduation year, E.G. senior non-Dinka officers are demoted at lower rank while SPLA Dinka members are promoted to high ranks, assigned and deployed.

Promotions are designed to benefit officers of one ethnic group and SPLA officers

E.G. Col. John Franco cohort 45 and Andrew Koul cohort 47. John was seniro to Andrew, promoted to Colonel and Andrew three time in short period of time to Lt.General



Five SPLA officers were promoted to Maj.Generals, while non-Dinka senior military officers were demoted 








NEPOTISM


3 Dinka Officers are related (Sons in law) to South Sudan Police Chief Lt. Gen Achuil Tito


GENDER

ZERO


SOUTH SUDAN PRISON OFFICERS LIST-ACTIVE AND NON ACTIVE








PRISON OFFICERS ACTIVE AND NON ACTIVE LIST

NOTE

LAID OFF LIST:  Consists of highly qualified experienced and skillful non Dinka Officers

Dr. Eluzai Mogga is holds BA in Edu from University of Juba as well as Diploma in Prison Services Studies from Prison Academy in Khartoum.

Col. Lukudu A. Nicholas, holds Degree in Law from Al-Nileen University in Khartoum, Diploma in Prison Services Studies from Prison Academy in Khartoum, and Teachers Colloge Diploma from Maradi Teachers Institute. 
 teachers 


Promotion Rule of Thumb: Officers o f same cohort receive promotion at the same time except when an indiviudal officer fails exam, traning and fitness, but in S. Sudan promotions based on officer ethnic color. 

The common dinomiator is that-All well trained, qualified, experienced, skillful and competent non-Dinka Officer are either LAID OFF, DEMOTED OR DEPRIVATE OF PROMOTIONS.





5 out of 10 laid off / non active
50%

9 out of 10 deprivate of promotions
90%

10 our 10 faced injustice and discrimination in work place
100%

7 out of 10 deprive of rightful promotions
70%


PROMOTIONS


















IRREGULARITIES AND INCONSISTENCES IN PROMOTION


Promotions are not consistence with cohort number and graduation year, E.G. senior non-Dinka officers are demoted at lower rank while SPLA Dinka members are promoted to high ranks, assigned and deployed.


LIST OF HILGY QUALITIED NON DINKA MILITARY OFFICERS NOT PROMOTED, WITHOUT ASSIGNMENT AND DEPLOYMENT


NOTE
NON ACTIVE LIST-MILITARY













5 out of 5 non-Dinka Medical Doctors and military officers are all citizens of CES
Both Dr. Alphonse and Dr. Luate were placed on non active list without assignments while their juniors Dinka were assigned or responsible for S. Sudan military hospital 
William  Philip Subek is demoted to Sergeant if thought he is a military academy graduate with rank of Officer, while Dinka Officers such as Malong promoted to full General. 
PROMOTIONS














20 out of 66 non-Dinka officers deprive of promotions
30%
25 out of 66 non-Dinka officers deprive of promotions are citizens of CES
38%
7 out of 66 non-Dinka officers deprive of promotions are citizens of EES
11%
4 out of 66 non-Dinka officers deprive of promoitions are citizens of WES
6%
14 out of 66 non-Dinka officers derive of promotions are citizens of UNS
21%
5 out of 66 non-Dinka officer deprive of promotions are members of Murle ethnic group (Jonglei)
7.50%
3 out of 66 non-Dinka officers deprive of promtions are citizens of WBG
4.50%
2 out 66 non-Dinka officers hold Med Degrees and Military Academy
3.00%
1 out of 66 non-Dinka officers deprive of promotions is a member of Nuer ethnic group (Unity)
1.50%
1 out of 66 non-Dinka officers deprive of promtions is a member of Jurchol ethnic group.
1.50%
IRREGULARITIES AND INCONSISTENCES IN PROMOTION
Promotions are not consistence with cohort number and graduation year, E.G. senior non-Dinka officers are demoted at lower rank while SPLA Dinka members are promoted to high ranks, assigned and deployed.
Based on figure above, promotions are designed to eliminate non Dinka officers who are citizens of of the following States: CES, EES, WES, UNS(Shilluk, Nuer and Murle), WBG (Fertit groups), and NBG (Jurchol)
Promotions are designed to get rid of non-Dinka officers with high qualifications, experienced,skillful, competent and  strong academic backgrounds
Non Active list is designed for non-Dinka officers with high qualifications, strong academic backgrounds and competency
Non Active list is designed for non-Dinka officers who are not members of SPLA,i.e. did not fought, but served under Khartoum regime.

List of S. Sudanese Ambassadors in Foreign Missions and Foreign Ministry





NOTE: AMASSADORS



%


23 out of 44 Ambassadors posted Abroad are Dinka
52%

12 out of 23 Ambassadors posted abroad are from Warrap State home state of Kiir
52%

4 out of  44 Abmassadors posted abroad are Nuer
9%

3 out of 44 Abmassadors posted abroad are Shilluk
7%

2 out of 44 Ambassadors postee abroad are Azande
5%

1 out of 44 Abmassador posted abroad is Ma'adi
2.20%

1 out of 43 Ambassador posted abroad is Kuku
2%

1 out of 43 Abmassador posted abroad is Peri
2%


GENDER






Only 6 Female posted Abroad
2

Only 2 Females are Head of Mission

Only 1 Female is Deputy Head of Mission

6 out of 44 Ambassadors posted abroad are female = 14% is less than 25% CPA Quota



ETHNIC REPRESENTATION





SOUTH SUDAN HAS 66 ETHNIC GROUPS AND ONLY 7 REPRESENTED ABROAD

7 out 66 ethnic groups are represented abroad
10%


REGIONS






Only 6 regions represented out of 32 States
19%


©Laku's Research Centre 2017





LIST OF DETAINEES AT SOUTH SUDAN NATIONAL SECURITY









Many other soldiers and civilians in military detention centers in Geida former Aboud ,Luri ,Bilfarm, Guoroum Mafil and former Mayor's Office.





Died in custody













Unconfirmed-death













Deported by Kenyan Govt to Juba












Abducted in Nairobi with the support of Kenyan security authority and transportated to Juba by Road







Important Remarks: Most of the detainees are non Dinka mostly from Equatoria States, followed by WBG State and Jongolei State was only one and released.
Important RemarkS: There is no one detianeeS from Kiir's State, and other Kiir's neigbouring states. This is clearly targeted illegal arrest and detaintions of non- Dinka.
Detainees at SSNS Centres
67 out of 67 detainees denied access to legal attorney
67 out of 67 detainees denied access to medical treatements
67 out of 67 detainees denied access to visitations 
67 out of 67 detainees denied visitations by IRCC
67 out of 67 detainees are in inhuman health conditions
12 out of 67 detainees are citizens of EES
14 out of 67 detainees are citizens of CES
10 out of 67 detainees are citizens of WES
9 out of 67 detainees are citizens of WBG
5 out of 67 detainees are citizens of US
16 out of 67 detainees-unknown States
8 out of 67 detainees died in SSNS custody
3 out of 67 detainees are Officers 
2 out of 67 detainees were abducted in Nairobi by the helped of Kenya national security 
1 out of 67 detainee is politician 
1 out of 67 detainee is a attorney
1 out of 67 detainee was released.Gov. Bakasoro
NOTE 2
On September 29th, 2017 Hon. Betty Achan, M.P., Deputy Co-Chair of SSND was asked about the detainees released by SSNS, she writes this:
Thank you for your mail.  Unfortunately I do not have the list of the released detainees.Sorry, Betty
NOEE 3
THERE IS NO CITIZEN OF THE FOLLOWING STATES IN CUSTODY OF SSNS: WARRAP, JONGLEI, NBG, AND LAKES
THERE IS NO DINKA DETAINEE AT THE CUSTODY OF SSNS.
©Laku's Research Centre2007

19%


Cc:\ IGAD
Cc:\ Members of Troika Member States
Cc:\ Foreign Missions in South Sudan
Cc:\ EU Member States
Cc:\ Members of EU Parliament
Cc:\ Members of US Foreign Relations Committee
Cc:\ Members of US Senate
Cc:\ Members of US House of Representatives
Cc:\ The White House
Cc:\ The USAID
Cc:\ Members of UK House of Commons
Cc:\ Members of Canadian House of Commons
Cc:\ Global Affairs, Canada
Cc:\ USIP
Cc:\ Chatham House
Cc:\ IPI
Cc:\ Major Media channels and newspaper

                  





Thursday, June 22, 2017

An Open Letter to U.S., Foreign Relation Committee

April 20th, 2017

To: Members of Foreign Relation Committee
United States Senate
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20510

An Open Letter to Foreign Relations Committee Members

Dear Members,


I write on behalf of the more than 1.5 million South Sudan refugees who have fled the violence caused by the senseless civil war in their country. The refugee situation is fast becoming one of the worst, the modern world has ever witnessed. The conflict and unprecedented violence rages on in South Sudan, continuing to cause suffering to millions to suffer. As of February 2017, the Office of the United Nations High Commission For Refugees has registered more than 1.5 million refugees who fled South Sudan into the neighboring countries. Details of the 1.5 million refugees who are as follows:

• Uganda (800,000)
• Ethiopia (350,000)
• Sudan (310,000)
• Kenya (89,000)
• Democratic Republic of Congo (68,000)
• Central African Republic (5,000)
These numbers continue to increase by the day and yet the host countries are already feeling the weight of caring for the millions of extra people in their midst, at a time when they are unable to continue helping these refugees without additional assistance. With no political solution in sight, the conflict in South Sudan is likely to worsen this year, with no peace or stability in sight for those who have fled their homes, and no reprieve for the countries that host them.

As a concerned member of your constituency, I am appealing to you on behalf of these millions of South Sudanese refugees and the local communities hosting them in the various countries, and urge you, as my Member of Parliament, to take action. The U.S.A., has a long-standing tradition of responding to humanitarian crisis around the world since its creation as a nation. I am proud that my country has served the needs of refugees world-wide, and that the U.S.A., is a leader in protecting defenseless populations worldwide. To continue this tradition of welcoming those fleeing persecution, The U.S.A., cannot turn its back on the South Sudanese refugees, in light of one of the worst humanitarian crises in modern history.

We also request that the U.S.A., help with the resettlement of the South Sudanese refugees once again. This response to South Sudanese refugees is necessary and urgent in order to help the host countries whose infrastructures are feeling tremendous pressure due to the millions of refugees in their midst.

What could be done?

• With the support of donor countries, the United Nations should establish a trusteeship to restore peace and order in South Sudan, and call for General Election in three years
• The trusteeship body should establish governance system based on a federal model, and Institute for Federalism at University of Fribourg should be the institution to oversee the establishment and management of the federal model
• Deployment of additional UN Peacekeeping Force in Equatoria, Western Bahar Al-Ghazal States and other parts of South Sudan
• The previous government public officials including Machar and Kiir who served from 2005-20017 should not seek or should not be permitted to seek public office for minimum period of ten years
• With the support of the international community the United Nations General Assembly should refer incriminated SPLA and senior government officials to International Criminal Court (ICC) for further investigations
• Western countries should impose targeted sanctions on specific government officials
• The UN should establish Tribunal Courts in South Sudan to persecute land grabbers and return the land to their rightful owners.
• The UN should establish the Hybrid Court recommended in ARCSS for trying individuals alleged of committing crimes against humanity
• The UN and the EU should support Hybrid Court with legal experts as well as financially
• Humanitarian assistance should be delivered to refugees in Uganda, DRC, Kenya, Sudan and CAR
Sincerely,




Justin Laku,Sr.

An Open Letter to Justin Trudeau, P.C.,M.P., Prime Minister of Canada and leader of the Liberal Party.

April 20th, 2017

Hon. Justin Trudeau, M.P.
Parliament of Canada
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0A6

Re: An Open Letter to Justin Trudeau, P.C.,M.P., Prime Minister of Canada and leader of the Liberal Party.


Dear Hon. Trudeau:

I write on behalf of the more than 1.5 million South Sudan refugees who have fled the violence caused by the senseless civil war in their country. The refugee situation is fast becoming one of the worst, the modern world has ever witnessed. The conflict and unprecedented violence rages on in South Sudan, continuing to cause suffering to millions to suffer. As of February 2017, the Office of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees has registered more than 1.5 million refugees who fled South Sudan into the neighboring countries. Details of the 1.5 million refugees who are as follows:

• Uganda (800,000)
• Ethiopia (350,000)
• Sudan (310,000)
• Kenya (89,000)
• Democratic Republic of Congo (68,000)
• Central African Republic (5,000)

These numbers continue to increase by the day and yet the host countries are already feeling the weight of caring for the millions of extra people in their midst, at a time when they are unable to continue helping these refugees without additional assistance. With no political solution in sight, the conflict in South Sudan is likely to worsen this year, with no peace or stability in sight for those who have fled their homes, and no reprieve for the countries that host them.

As a concerned member of your constituency, I am appealing to you on behalf of these millions of South Sudanese refugees and the local communities hosting them in the various countries, and urge you, as my Member of Parliament, to take action. Canada has a long-standing tradition of responding to humanitarian crisis around the world since its creation as a nation. I am proud that my country has served the needs of refugees world-wide, and that Canada is a leader in protecting defenseless populations worldwide. To continue this tradition of welcoming those fleeing persecution, Canada cannot turn its back on the South Sudanese refugees, in light of one of the worst humanitarian crises in modern history.

We also request that Canada help with the resettlement of the South Sudanese refugees once again. This response to South Sudanese refugees is necessary and urgent in order to help the host countries whose infrastructures are feeling tremendous pressure due to the millions of refugees in their midst.

What could be done?

• With the support of donor countries, the United Nations should establish a trusteeship to restore peace and order in South Sudan, and call for General Election in three years
• The trusteeship body should establish governance system based on a federal model, and Institute for Federalism at University of Fribourg should be the institution to oversee the establishment and management of the federal model
• Deployment of additional UN Peacekeeping Force in Equatoria, Western Bahar Al-Ghazal States and other parts of South Sudan
• The previous government public officials including Machar and Kiir who served from 2005-20017 should not seek or should not be permitted to seek public office for minimum period of ten years
• With the support of the international community the United Nations General Assembly should refer incriminated SPLA and senior government officials to International Criminal Court (ICC) for further investigations
• Western countries should impose targeted sanctions on specific government officials
• The UN should establish Tribunal Courts in South Sudan to persecute land grabbers and return the land to their rightful owners.
• The UN should establish the Hybrid Court recommended in ARCSS for trying individuals alleged of committing crimes against humanity
• The UN and EU should support Hybrid Court with legal experts as well as financially
• Humanitarian assistance should be delivered to refugees in Uganda, DRC, Kenya, Sudan and CAR




Thanks for your interest in South Sudan, Justin Laku,Sr.

True Greatest Heroes of South Sudan Video