Tuesday, April 28, 2020

Every believer is a Christian & Church is supposed to be a picture for society


There are over 100 queries about topic posted on social media titled “Equatorians Curse”. I came across one posting of great interest and d’ like to provide following responses to writer of below query.

I’d like to response to writer from OT & NT Exegesis; Principles of Biblical Hermeneutics apologetic and church history.  My approach defines the concept of church and its mission in both OT & NT, church history, the usage of phrase Rubuna fi in linga frank of Juba Arabic, and cross reference  with the initial article and false claims brought forward by writer about “blaming believers of Ngun Kata” … “popular religious expression coined by the Kakwas of Yei.”  

The concept of church in both OT, NT, church history and Principles of Biblical Hermeneutics was a place for worship and teaching see Amos. In the classic the word “ekklésia” means the following:


1.    An assembly, congregation, church. An assembly, congregation, church.
2.    The Church, the whole body of Christian believers.
3.    The synonymous of “ekklésia” in Hebrew is “Kahal.”
4.  The word “church” comes from the classic word kyriakos, means “belonging to the Lord” (kyrios). ekklēsía ("church") is the root of the terms "ecclesiology" and "ecclesiastical”.

Again, the history of defending the faith (apologetics) remained us that “church” is not only place for worship and teaching, but also, place for both believers, nominal Christian (church goers) and non-believers-why? Because God’s message is for Christian believers to encourage them to stay firmed in faith, and on another hand, Preacher presents message of salvation to nominal Christians and non-believers to accept God in Three Persons and have personal relationship with Him. Thus, why you hear salvation message at the end of each Sunday’s sermons. The preacher offers call for


1.    Repentance;
2.    Acceptance of God in Three Persons, develop personal relationship with creator;
3.    Baptism;
4.    Confirmation;
5.    Daily prayer and meditations;
6.    Reading scripture and
7.    Confession.
8.    Ask forgiveness-this is the process for believers who follow God in Three Persons.
So, if you think your faith is being attack you better understand the concept of church in OT, NT, principles of Biblical apologetics, hermeneutics. The church belongs to God and He alone can defend His body of Christ. He did through the history. Otherwise you classify yourself as “NIF-Fanatic” which lack Biblical reasoning.



Today, some churches have deviated from its original meaning and mission. Church supposed to be a picture for society, unfortunately, it became picture of a society. Not only that, some churches became Christian social club and business centres-money making forgot to follow instruction of God recorded in Matt 25: 35-39.


35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’ 37 “Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 
38 When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39 When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’ 


You know that, the Bible was brought to us on donkey back, but today, on private jets, BMWs and Benz-this is the realities of some churches and its nominal Christians who are not Christian believers. Read below. This is just one out of many examples of those who claimed more Christian then others.
“A senior member of the Catholic Church known as the "luxury bishop" has been suspended from his diocese in Germany while the Vatican investigates a house refurbishment that reportedly ran into the millions of dollars.”
Thanks to Pope Francis for cleaning up the messes created by some Archbishops, bishops and priests. May God gives him health and many years to come.

Therefore, not every Christian is a believer, but every believer is a Christian. You can go to church, but it does not make you believer and follower of Jesus who can carry His cross every day. See Luke 14:27 “And whoever does not carry their cross and follow me cannot be my disciple.”


For instance, you go church to show off your new African attires, car, new hairstyle, meet friends and other, but your heart full of evils act. Kiir and some of his ministers attend Sunday prayers through the year and see their actions towards others in the country-opposite God’s teaching. So, going to church does not make believers who carry cross of God in Three Persons. Now, I’d like to move to my responses to writer of “Kakwas of Yei”


PLEASE, BELOW ARE MY RESPONSES TO WRITER AT EACH PARAGRAPH.
I wish to make a brief comment on the article which  was forwarded to this forum and in it's   contents,  a great deal is devoted to blaming believers of Ngun Kata, which is a popular religious expression coined by the Kakwas of Yei before it became a kind of a slagon for the religious groups in Equatoria.


RESPONSES
The article never devoted to put blame on the failures of Equatorians on a small group of religious followers, rather than it stated this, there are some pastors promoting the phrase Ngun kata/ Rubuna fi and there is no anywhere in the article mentioned of “failures of Equatorians put on religious follower” I stand to be corrected.


The phrase Ngun kata/ Rubuna fi is commonly used by all nominal Christians (church goers), believers, Muslims, and traditionalists across former Sudan and South Sudan. Some Karo members do speak, write and understand the phrase. However, most Karo members only speak and few can write Karo languages. Again, I stand to be corrected.
Other phrases has equal meaning to Rubuna fi:
1.    Seebu la Rubuna;
2.    Rubuna be Ayanu;
3.    Allah be Ayanu; and
4.    Huwa bi ligo tawo min Rubuna


All these phrases are derived from classical Arabic and only Arabic speakers know the root of these phrases. These phrases are not only used by nominal Christians / church goers, believers, but also by Muslims, traditionalist, and others. If you think otherwise, you’re not living the realities of South Sudan and out of touch with what’s happening in the country.


Rubuna fi/ Seebu la Rubuna/ Rubuna be Ayanu/ Allah be Ayanu/ Huwa bi ligo tawo min Rubuna and its synonymous means the following:
1.    If person sees herself/himself unable to face aggressor;
2.    Things become difficult cannot solve it;
3.    Situation(s)/problem(s) overcome persons’ ability to deal it;
4.    Weak to get her/his rights he/she says I left my case to Allah and let Allah be the judge because God Has Supreme power to claim my rights from  aggressors or villains and by invoking God’s name creates fear to villains to do justice or do right act;
5.    It is petition to God’s intervention on behalf of victims; and
6.    When victims surround her/his rights to oppressors and throw everything to God’s shoulders. In Arabic called Allah is hanger.

So, it is not correct to claim that only Christians are using these phrases. These phrases are common in ling frank across former Sudan and South Sudan.

My question is how can this learned writer of this article blame the failures of Equatorians on a small group of religious people? Some of us who believe in God and Jesus Christ feel uncomfortable and offended about this alleged wrongdoing of those who love God.


RESPONSES
You’re not the only believer of God in Three Persons in the world who felt uncomfortable and offended by the opinion and viewpoint of writer. 


As stated in article in 1515, Dr. Luther challenged the corrupted catholic church leaders. The challenge made most church leaders uncomfortable and felt offended. The Bible on your hand, was a result of challenge to early church leaders who felt challenged by the truth of Word of God. The best Bible transitions of English, Kakwa and other transitions from Greek and Hebrew was result of uncomfortable writings that offended many church goers and believers including Pope Leo X, Archbishops, Bishops, Priests.


Thanks to Dr. Luther who made catholic church leaders uncomfortable and offended-this is very natural feelings to those who are afraid of challenge and bounced back to defense mode. If you read debates between Luther, Calvin, and Menno Simons on one hand and catholic church on other, you’ll find it was very enriching and empowered many believers to build personal relationship with God in Three Persons and non-believer accepted God’s message. See church history in middle ages.
Side note: Menno Simons the Mennonites (MCC), members of a Protestant sect founded by Menno Simons in the 16th century, were widely persecuted in Europe. God used them with their uncomfortable writings to bring the Good News to you.


I wonder whether the author of this article knows why we  the Equatorians have failed and caused our  oppression, subjugation, and being relegated  to perhaps no class citizens, grabbing of Equatorian land,  mistreatment and shame brought on ud. How can the entire Equatorians from West to East  and entire region that's  bigger than East Africa, be a failure because simply  a group of religious people have believe d that Ngun Kata?


RESPONSES
The article does not generalize a group of religious people-they could be religious but not believers, but it focuses on the usage of the word Ngun Kata/ Rubuna fi. Additionally, the article focuses on the psychological effect of the word Ngun Kata, Rubuna fi/ Rubuna be Ayanu/ Ana Seebu la Rubuna in the minds of Equatorians result in complicit.


The author of this article did not bother to inform his readers of other factors that have made Equatorians to be failures. If the writer is familiar with biblical concepts of war and peace, then the story of David defeating Goliath the Giant should have helped him. That war was fought through God helping David because the Israelites army trusted in a victory led by God. There are many examples in the Bible.  In order to inform them, it is a popular fact here in SS  that, we the  Equatorians, are dead divisionists,  worse tribalistic   himitites. That we  are known for our  cowerdice  and empty pride.


RESPONSES
The thesis of article was not intended for factors that have made Equatorians to be failures and concept of war and peace in OT. See para 1, last line where thesis was clearly stated. Focus on thesis.

I have taken the liberty to provide you with references of David and Goliath events as recorded in the Bible and never assumed that you’re the only good Christian or enough Christian and the only one can defend the faith more than others. God judges’ people by faith and believing in Scripture.
However, I concur with your point “are dead diversionists, worse tribalistic   himitites. That we are known for our cowardice and empty pride.”


1 Samuel 17:4 NIV
A champion named Goliath, who was from Gath, came out of the Philistine camp. His height was six cubits and a span.
1 Samuel 17:8 NIV
Goliath stood and shouted to the ranks of Israel, “Why do you come out and line up for battle? Am I not a Philistine, and are you not the servants of Saul? Choose a man and have him come down to me.
1 Samuel 17:23 NIV
As he was talking with them, Goliath, the Philistine champion from Gath, stepped out from his lines and shouted his usual defiance, and David heard it.
1 Samuel 21:9 NIV
The priest replied, “The sword of Goliath the Philistine, whom you killed in the Valley of Elah, is here; it is wrapped in a cloth behind the ephod. If you want it, take it; there is no sword here but that one.” David said, “There is none like it; give it to me.”
1 Samuel 22:10 NIV
Ahimelek inquired of the LORD for him; he also gave him provisions and the sword of Goliath the Philistine.”
2 Samuel 21:19 NIV
In another battle with the Philistines at Gob, Elhanan son of Jair the Bethlehemite killed the brother of Goliath the Gittite, who had a spear with a shaft like a weaver’s rod.
1 Chronicles 20:5 NIV
In another battle with the Philistines, Elhanan son of Jair killed Lahmi the brother of Goliath the Gittite, who had a spear with a shaft like a weaver’s rod.

Latin:
Tantum sit gratia Dei et credere scripturam hanc gratiam et praeter te non est de opera tua, et donum ex Deo.
Above is the Latin line Dr. Luther used against corrupted catholic church in Rome-Translation: You’re save only by Grace of God and you’re knowledge in the scripture. The God’s Grace is a gift from God and not of your work. See Ephesians 2:8 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God:
Side note: God’s grace is like sun rays which shines on both believers and non-believers, church goers without exception. See liberation Theology-The act of cross.


They say Equatorians are known for lack of a strong will, innovation, craftiness and strategy of how to survive as a region under the hawkish eyes of the dominant forces lurking around.  We are  very lukewarm in the affairs of this nation. For example,   we do not feature  highly in the media. We don't respond intellectually and effectively on issues. That concern us. We do not appear as South Sudanese but rather like spectators. Our meritocracy is hidden perhaps under our inferiority complex I don't know and we do not struggle for the best . We are like  accompanying those who pose as successful on the journey while we are at the rear. Do why blame it on the church?


RESPONSES
There is nowhere in the initial article mentioned of “They say Equatorians are known for lack of a strong will, innovation, craftiness and strategy of how to survive as a region under the hawkish eyes of the dominant forces lurking around.” Please, double check the initial article and cross reference your facts.
Again, I concur with your below lines: “That concern us. We do not appear as South Sudanese but rather like spectators. Our meritocracy is hidden perhaps under our inferiority complex I don't know, and we do not struggle for the best. We are like accompanying those who pose as successful on the journey while we are at the rear.”
Again, there is nowhere in the article mentioned “blame it on the church”. Again, please, check your facts by reading the initial posting.


The Israelites succeeded in those devastating wars because they realised they had offered God and when they sorted out issues of their relationship with God and reconciled to him, they established s series of succeeded in the wars with their enemies. Do how do you see the Israelites today? Those in the diaspora, those at home, everywhere on the face of the Earth....Do they have divisions among themselves?  What are they seeking? Meritocracy, innovation, excellence, always the best on the top in everything.


Yes, Israelites succeeded because of THE HIGH DEGREE of FAITH as well as SERVANT LEADERSHIP MOSES. I worked in Israel and have a Rabbi for many years who helped me understand Jewish culture and differences between Jewish from Eastern and Western Europe and North America. When I was in Israel, witnessed fight among the Jewish of different backgrounds, but the only different between Jewish and Equatorians is that-they fight inside the room and keep their differences inside the room and never expose it to their enemies. Also, what unites them is the concept of State of Israel and Holocaust. these are two symbol of unity and they identify themselves with.


Question: What is the degree of Equatorains faith? Can it move the mountains? How do you measure person’s faith? Yes, most Equatorains do pray, are their prayers acceptable to God and answered?
I would like to share with you below prayers, which I found very inspirational
The power of prayers
When you pray
If the request is wrong, God says No
(Red light);
When you pray
If the time is wrong, God says slow
(Yellow light);
When you pray
If we are wrong, God says grow.
But
If the request; the time; and we are right
God says Go====>
(Green light)

Do Equatorians have great servant leader who leader them to land of honey and milk? I don’t claim to know everything but learning every day.


Similarly, the concept of unity of Equatorians in 1960s,1970s,1980s and 1990s was Awulad Juba/ NAS ta Juba/ Ja’am ta Juba. That was unified logo for unite of Equatorians. SOSSA was great example-every Southern Sudanese in Cairo and other parts of the world identifies by SOSSA even nonstudents. It became linga frank or symbol of unite among Southern Sudanese oversees.

Please do not blame the church for the failures of Equatorians. Whosoever wrote it, this article is provocative and disheartening. However, remain safe and blessed.


RESPONSE
Once again, never in the initial posting blame was put on church for failures of Equatorains. Remember our Lord provoked the Roman Empire and have disheartening many Rabbis of OT and NT. Provocation of Dr. Luther in 1530 empowered the early church faith and it was disheartening to corrupted catholic church leaders for failing to understand the main argument Luther put before the church to self-correct itself-self regulate, but refused to do so and church division was the end result. But it was God’s works to advance His message through provocation words and messages. Act 1:8 But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.”


Jesus’s act of driving sellers and buyers from Father’s house provoked the Rabbis, sellers, buyers and Rome authorities. See John 2:16 “To those who sold doves he said, “Get these out of here! Stop turning my Father’s house into a market!”
Are the Equatorians church goers, nominal Christians and believers are the only one in church history to be provoke for self-correction?


In nutshell, you missed the main point presented in the initial article. I am to state the facts, and shed light on the facts in the initial article. I took liberty to provide you with answers from OT, NT hermeneutics, apologetics, church history and classic Arabic.  


Annex:
I reread the initial article several times and drew below summary of each paragraph to show writer intention as presented. Also, I did count important words in the initial article and cross reference them with writer’s claim (Kakwas’ claims) that “so much was devoted on blaming church goers” which is not true based on words count and summary of each paragraph.

SUMMARY OF EACH PARAGRAPH
para 1:         Thesis is the last line of para one
para 2:         reinforced thesis
para 3:         provides Talib’s essays on governance
para 4:         provides example of promotion of word Rubuna fi, “SOME EQUATORIAN CHURCH LEADERS are prompting this curse-Rubuna fi”. IT USES WORD SOME of Equatorian church leaders but does not generalized.
Para 5:         provides usage of God’s names in Jewish culture
Para 6:         provides historical background to reformation movement and corruption in the catholic church.
Para 7:         provides strategy for Equatorian to fight injustice
“To develop strategies to fight injustice in whatever forms and God will be in agreement with the victims’ efforts to free themselves” It also, validated Equatorians’ competency.
Para 8:         posed question: “The million question is: Are Equatorians using their competencies, skills, and knowledge to deliver federalism and save themselves from all forms of evil?”
Para 9:         provide concept of liberation Theology: how to activate God’s blessings and power for God to works his miracles
Para   10:     provides villains taking advantage
“The take home message is, the villains are taking the advantage of Rubuna fi mindsets of Equatorian and keep occupying more lands, dumping more cattle” … ‘villains’ culture of stealing”
Para 11:       provides villains’ strategy to starve… hunger…
Para 12:       provides action plan-the way forward in 9 points
Para 13:       Equatorians should not put their hopes on rubber stamp SS Parliament and if not careful might be refugees in their own land.
“This is the last call for Equatorians to wake up and act before assuming situation of Palestinian in occupying land. If Equatorian are not careful they will end up refugees in their own land.”
Way forward
1.    To revisit self-serving interests of local Chiefs and some community members who are selling lands to the villains. The strategy should be land leasing as oppose to selling. Consult “Land Law, by Judith-Anne Mackenzie & Mary Phillips)
2.    To lead and put an end to the mindset of been followers of misleading leaders.

Usage of important Words in initial article:

1.    Rubuna fi                                    appears 10 times
2.    Ngun kata                                   appears 3 times
3.    Curse                                         appears 4 times
4.    Land grabs                                  appears 16 times
5.    Dumping                                     appears 7times
6.    Injustice                                     appears 6 times
7.    Victim/victimization                   appears
8.    church leaders                            appear (EQ) 1 time
9.    churches in Great Equatoria        appears 1 time
1.    church leaders (Rome)                appears 1 time
1.    Church                                       appears 2 times
1.   Church reformation movement    appears 1 time
1.   catholic church                           appears 1 time
1. unity                                           appears 1
1. purpose                                       appears


Monday, April 15, 2019

An Open Letter to Ambassador Ismail Wais, the IGAD Special Peace Envoy to South Sudan



Dear Ambassador Ismail Wais,


I am writing in response to your letter dated 1 March 2019, Invitation to a meeting in Addis Ababa. In your letter you labelled non-signatories from the South Sudan National Democratic Alliance (SSNDA) – members who refused to buy into the flawed and fake Khartoum Peace Agreement (KPA) – as being “spoilers and (shall) be held accountable”.


I am outraged and gravely concerned about the use of undiplomatic language, unethical, unfair, unwise, one-sided and biased diatribe against the members of SSNDA. Your letter is designed to bully the National Salvation Front (NAS) and other opposition leaders into giving in to the complacency of the Inter-Governmental Authority on Development (IGAD).


I would like to respond to your letter by addressing the following: two concepts of mediators and facilitation; the imposed, flawed and fake Khartoum Peace Agreement; the real peace spoilers; IGAD’s bias; and deforestation in Equatoria. I will then draw my conclusion.

A mediator who presides over peace negotiations should be an impartial facilitator with no link to either party in a negotiation. He/she should have no interest in the substance of an agreement itself, but is, rather, concerned with the process of helping the parties reach a satisfactory agreement on their own.


Additionally, a credible and impartial mediator should facilitate and negotiate in “good faith”. Good faith is an important concept in any type of negotiation along with trust and honesty, which serve to minimise the gaps between the parties in the conflict.


The aim of a competent mediator is to minimise the gap between the regime in Juba and SSNDA and develop a holistic plan to address the root causes of the problems caused by the tribal government of President Salva Kiir; establish a framework to address and propose a fair way forward to address the root causes of the conflicts; propose a Confederate system of governance in the post-transitional period; and establish how to eliminate the culture of corruption with impunity, kleptocracy, administrative corruption, Dinkanization-Nuerization policy, institutionalised discrimination, political detention, and land-grabbing by members of the Juba regime.


By your actions, you are defending the interests of Kiir’s regime by imposing on the non-signatories of the flawed and fake KPA. Your biased KPA serves the economic and water resources interests of neighbouring countries of Egypt, Sudan, Kenya and Uganda.


The non-signatories to the imposed, flawed and fake KPA are the truly credible groups who represent the interests of the vast majority of South Sudanese, especially the Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) and the refugees, who have been forced out of their homes by the Kiir regime which you are defending. The Kiir regime has not only killed, raped, and driven South Sudanese into United Nations protection (UNPCO) and refugee camps, they have also stolen billions of South Sudanese resources, leaving the population poor and starving.


As you know, the imposed flawed and fake peace agreement serves only the interests of the leaders in the region who are facilitating and fuelling genocide in slow motion in Equatoria and harbouring looted public funds for development. They are concealing billions of stolen monies from South Sudan in their bank accounts in Egypt, Sudan, Uganda, Kenya and Ethiopia. Western taxpayers would keenly want to see IGAD develop appropriate strategies to recover the stolen money so that it could be redirected to pay for the implementation of the peace process, and rebuilding health care and education systems and provide clean water to all. The theft of public funds is in itself a conflict driver and peace spoiler, but never SSNDA.


The peace spoilers are Egypt, Sudan and Uganda who deployed their troops to South Sudan to protect their economic interests – oil fields, illegal teak logging, gold mining businesses, and water and natural resources in the Equatoria States.


Additionally, the intervention of Sudan into the internal affairs of South Sudan is an attempt to revive the policy of Arabisation and Islamisation of South Sudan, and to remote-control Kiir to submit to the war criminal of Sudan. Such unwarranted and illicit interventions by Sudan and Uganda in the internal affairs of neighbouring member states runs counter to the African Union Principles of Non-Interference.


On 19 March 2019, Uganda’s President Yoweri Museveni wrote to Rwanda’s President Paul Kagame and stated that he stands by the AU Non-Interfering Principle: Interfering in the internal affairs of sister countries is wrong because, first of all, outsiders cannot understand situations of sister countries well”. And yet the same Museveni interferes in South Sudan’s internal affairs daily and deploys Ugandan troops to Equatoria States. Yet IGAD under your stewardship is giving a blind eye to the violation of the AU Non-Interference Principle.


The IGAD’s Non-Interference policy simply means that the AU and IGAD turn a blind eye to the illegal activities of the neighbouring states in South Sudan. Museveni is contradicting himself. Museveni is responsible for political instability in Congo, Rwanda, Burundi and South Sudan. He has intervened directly in the internal affairs of South Sudan, and IGAD is silent about it. Museveni is a clear conflict driver. He is the peace spoiler of the imposed, flawed and fake peace negotiation, and deforestation in Equatoria.


The IGAD principle objective for the establishment of the Inter-Governmental Authority on Drought and Development (IGADD) in 1996 was to prevent deforestation and now the agency has chosen to turn a blind eye to the man-made deforestation in Equatoria States. The illegal logging business is a conflict driver, and Uganda and Kenya by engaging in illegal logging and mining are peace spoilers to the 2015 Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (ARCSS) and the 2018 Revitalised Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS).


The 2015 signing of the ARCSS reaffirmed the establishment of the UN/AU Hybrid Court to prosecute sanctioned SPLA illiterate generals and government officials who participated in and facilitated the senseless December 2013 and June 2016 ethnic conflicts that targeted the Nuer people, as well as the perpetration of war crimes against humanity and money laundering.


Once again IGAD under your leadership failed the hopes of victims of rape and crimes against humanity. This is why the survivors are unwilling and afraid to leave the UNPCO camps. The donors, friends of IGAD and victims of the 2013 and 2016 ethnic conflicts are anxiously waiting to see justice done. They are watching with eagle eyes to see when IGAD would embark on advocacy to rally support for the establishment of the UN Hybrid Court.


Currently, there is ongoing forceful recruitment in eight states: Yirol, Rumbek, Twic, Tonj, Gogrial, Gok, Aweil (known as Aweil Algadim or Old Aweil), and in Bhar Al Ghazal. President Kiir and Akol Koor, Director South Sudan National Security Service (SSNS), tasked and directed Major General Lual Wek and Angelo Taban to carry out forced recruitments. So far over 9,000 ethnic Dinka men have been recruited.


The illegal, one-tribe recruitment policy runs against the current KPA. Yet IGAD remains totally silent about it. This is deafening. If there is any greater danger for South Sudan and a real peace spoiler, it is the forceful recruitment of one tribal group at a time when SSNDA is calling for the formation of one national army that reflects the national character of 64 ethnic groups in the country.


Excluding other parties in the conflict from renegotiating R-ARCSS is another conflict driver.


In your letter you indicated that there is to be no renegotiation of R-ARCSS: yet you re-engaged Paul Malong who was not a party to R-ARCSS and invited him to be part of R-ARCSS, while on the other hand, you excluded the following parties: General Cosmas WoriKojo, Chairman of the National Resistance Front (NRF), Dr Hakim Moi of PDM, and Mr Taban Julu of PDM. Both Dr Moi and Mr Julu are parties to R-ARCSS as well as members of the diaspora in North America, Europe and Australia. They participated in the talks.


The above example is evidence that IGAD is clearly playing the politics of indifference and discrimination, and it has become a carbon copy of the Juba regime.


Your one-sided and arrogant letter undermines human rights and the rights of the voiceless, the innocent, the Internal Displaced Persons (IDPs) in UNPCO, and the victims of the Juba regime who are still living in the UN camps (UNPCOs). Your legacy will be remembered as that of a failed mediator who was responsible for selling out the peace process, leading to the betrayal of millions of people. You betrayed the aspirations of victims of ethnic cleansing, and the urge to help by donor states and friends of IGAD.


If the situation does not change, your legacy will be remembered as being the mouthpiece of the Juba regime, the sellout peace envoy who has betrayed the region and who has chosen to go against all principles of conflict resolution and facilitation. Instead, you are now leading the fight on behalf of the unelected Juba regime’s interests.


You seem to want to exonerate the burning issues of the tribal government of Kiir and his tribal advisers of the Jieng Council of Elders (JCE) that led the country into senseless ethnic civil war, a war which has claimed thousands of lives and driven millions to refugee camps in neighbouring countries.


For the SSNDA, you will be remembered as a toothless bully mediator who tried to impose unreasonable conditions on the authentic voices for the voiceless. From this, I can envisage that your next move might be to lock up General Thomas C Swaka under house arrest in Ethiopia or even hand him over to killers in Juba. This is very clear from your threatening language.


For the suffering church of South Sudan, the relatives of the late Reverend Lasu of Yei – who appeared before Adama Dieng, the UN’s Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide and was murdered by the SSNS – and rape victims, you will be remembered as the mediator who failed to hold the Juba regime accountable for the rape of Western aid workers, and all violations of the peace agreement.


For the conflict and development analysts and policy-makers, you will be remembered as the promoter of the oppressor, and a mediator that asserts the economic interests of neighbouring countries into agreement and who supercedes the interests of the South Sudanese.


Your proposed solution is only dealing with the symptoms, rather than the root causes of ethnic civil war. Unfortunately, IGADs’ approach to peace is harmful, manipulative and lacks an overall solution to the main problems created by the tribal government in Juba.


In a nutshell, if Kiir himself has confirmed that R-ARCSS is a flawed peace agreement and it is not going to deliver good governance and economic development, then why on earth are you trying to drag SSNDA into it, while knowing very well that it is not going to effect any positive changes in people’s lives?


The Juba regime has failed to pay public servant salaries for over six months, failed to improve living standards, provide security, and ensure the development of basic service delivery to effect changes in people’s lives.


There are many still living in the UNPCOs in Juba and other parts of the country – are you blind to all of these? How could you call your peace a just peace? Peace without justice is not peace.


The real peace-spoilers are the IGAD and its leadership; Uganda, Kenya, Egypt and Sudan; President Kiir’s tribal Jieng Council of Elders; Kiir himself; and the forced recruitment of Dinka ethnic youth – not the members of the SSNDA.


I call on IGAD, the AU, the Troika, and friends of IGAD to seriously consider Swisspeace, IofC International, Professor Vern Redekop of CICR, Jeff Mapendere of the Canadian International Institute of Applied Negotiation (CIIAN) and the NCPA to replace Ambassador Ismail Wais before it is too late.


 

Fraught Sudan poll imperils democracy

  Fraught Sudan poll imperils democracy By  Justin Laku Sudanese democracy is being killed by multiple assassins, writes Justun Laku. ...