I
have read the article and I felt it is a tool that is geared to incite hatred
of a collective tribes of Equatorians against one tribe, the Jiengs. The
article is one sided. It avoided to answer the question of those Jiengs and
other non-Jiengs who had to pay some Equatorian landlords and those who
impersonate as landlords. Those were paid once, twice, three times even in
order to finally obtain the same pieces of lands. Those should be called money
grabbers and their act, too, should be considered unjust. Anyway, I’ll be one of
those who will support our Equatorian brothers and sisters’ fight, through
peaceful means, in order to bring about justice. If Equatorians feel that they
have not been treated fairly and the majority of Jieng and non-Jieng know about
this, the Equatorians’ fight should not be Equatorians’ fight against
injustice. Jieng and non-Jieng should join that fight because, if Equatorians
are not living in peace, no one should live in peace. It should be a fight
against injustice. These cases are cases that should be discussed in Parliament
and a policy applicable anywhere in SS should be arrived at. This will mean,
the same procedures a non-Equatorians go through in order to obtain land in
Equatoria should be exactly the same procedures that an Equatorian, who want to
own land anywhere in SS, would go through. The expression, “ancestral land” is
a toxic expression that is often used by those who want to incite tribal
hatred. If it has some reasonable use, it should be if we were to drive non-African
people out of Africa. As for us, the SS, any part of SS is our ancestral land.
Anyone who is interesting in studying human history, will not fail to notice
the fact that Africans have been moving around within Africa and even out of
Africa. Period.
Girr’s
Position
I’ll
over look this error because it the kind of error a person who is blinded by
emotions and hatred would often make. Again with this kind of language of
generalizations, not only are you supporting a good cause of the Equatorians,
you are also making enemies of people would otherwise have supported the cause.
I’m one of those who spoke up concerning land issue as well as other issues
some years ago. If you are interested, visit my page and read. But, according
to you, I have no “balls” and “therefore, I must “shut up”. Well, you who have
got “balls”, don’t wait a day or two. Go right now and show us what a person
with “balls” can do. Action! Your fight, yours alone, will (is not) against
Jieng people as you put it, but against SS government (the whole system of the
governing body). Oops! I should shut up. Good luck, my brother, or, should I
say, “my enemy?”
RESPONSE:
Dear
Giir:
Thanks
for your input!
I
would like to answer you in the following fashion: article is one-sided; land
grabs; illegal money obtained unethically from government coffer to purchased lands;
land grabs; the rubber stamp Parliament; corruption,
incite hatred; and ancestral land and provide some details to contextualized
the argument advanced to validate Equatorians, Chollo, Fertit, Murle, and other
grievances. I shall commence with one-sided point.
Please,
for future references when you read any article dealing with grievances, make
sure you read it with open eyes or in legal term called “legal eyes”.
The piece is intended for Equatorians and addressing the problem of one-sided
ruling system of Juba regime and therefore, it one-sided-from victims’ side.
Similarly, to Equatorains are Chollo, Fertit, Murle and others who have experienced
dehumanization, victimization, injustice, women and young girl rape and land
grabs.
Like
Equatorians Chollo, Fertit, Murle and
others have echoed major grievances in their respected areas to Juba regime and
no resolutions till today. Please, see below links and please, listen but not
just hear to Lt. Gen. Johnson Oliny carefully. Lt. Gen. Oliny’s main legal argument
is Chollos’ land grabs.
This
brings me to your own words “These cases are cases that should be discussed in
Parliament and a policy applicable”. Do your really believe in the SS
Parliament as the Third arm of government? If so, how could you called it Parliament
if most of its members were appointed and not elected? This is a cheap way to try
to establish argument on unsubstantiated legal ground.
In 2008,
Hon. Dr. K. Mula, M.P., tabled motion to address problem of dumping of cattle which
created insecurity in WES, the motion was rejected by majority of one ethnicity
MPs and led to Dr. Mula to quick SPLM, stood an independent in 2010 General
Elections and won against the SPLM candidate. What this means?
Today, most
of communities in EES and CES are experiencing similar 2008 situation of WES-cattle
dumping. Since Juba regime is not interested in forcing cattle owners to relocate
their cattle to where they came from, cattle dumping may require local
solutions. The SS Parliamentarians are the rubber stamps of Kiir and all were bought
with $40K six months ago and recently with $25K while the rest of public servants
working without salaries for over 4 months ($20K+40K is equal to price tag of
one MP to support Kiir’s bad policy of Dinkanization).
Please, educate
us why government pays one sector of employees and not others with medical expenses
and transportation allowances.
As stated earlier that, you missed the main legal argument
in the piece, the article discusses problem of land grabs and not land purchased
by illegal money obtained unethically from government coffer to occupy Equatoria
ancestral lands. The question you may wanna answer and educate readers with is-how could one ethnicity
in the country is the only one group that has access to money to purchased lands
with Quadruple price in a time public servants received no wages for over 9
months? The readers would be happy to know your take. Is this not the corruption
in day light. How comes non-Dinka cannot buy lands in Bor and Aweil and Warrap?
Let
me help you with some corruption examples and you can provide us with more in
your next response with solutions to put an end to it.
1.
Hospitals
remained sustained by international organizations, while constitutional post
holders and senior government officials seek travel to India, Jordan, Kenya,
South Africa, Egypt, Germany, and UK for even common non-referral illnesses,
costing millions of dollars!
2.
In 2008, Dura
Saga: Fake business contractors delivering ghost grains to hungry states and
the case despite being widely exposed, remains not investigated to date. The Audit
of 2008 notes contracts to purchase some $2.3 billion worth of dura Johnson, 2016,
p.37.
3.
The Ministry’s
purchase of 400 Land Cruisers, without tender was one of the first corruption
scandals of the era (PAGSSNA, for the Year Ended 31December, 2008, p.13.
4. On
Aug 2012, the president did accuse 75 of his government officials of stealing USD
$4 billion from the world’s newest country (McClatchy Newspapers).
5.
Nile
Commercial Bank 'List of Shame'! A list of high-profile debtors causes a
public-private bank to go bankrupt, gets exposed, but nobody is unnamed until
now! Former Central Bank Governor pointed a finger at someone at the top and
nothing happened!
6.
3. Two
Ministers of Finance implicated in squandering millions of US Dollars, got
exposed, but got out and continued with their lives!
The
article was not advocating for hatred rather than putting ink on the letters-grievances
of Equatorians and calls for them for unity of purpose. There is nothing wrong for
Equatorians to unit because they always co-existed peacefully for many years
until 2006 when bullying, victimization, dehumanization and land grabs policy
were instituted by Kiir and his associates to drive them out of their ancestral
land using state resources and by abusing his authority.
Kiir
is the only person in the country who inciting hatred. On August 20, 2015,
Peter Moi Julius was shot dead by unidentified gunmen. The death of Peter Moi Julius was popularly attributed
to President Salva Kiir’s threat to kill journalists for reporting against the
country (Sudan Tribune online newspaper). You need get your facts rights specially
on public domain and provided evidences to support your unfounded claims.
A similar argument was made by Kiir in his remarks
in Juba on October 20, 2016, that Equatorians had not participated in the
liberation of South Sudan, and therefore, the Dinka and Nuer alone, held the
right to centralize political power, monopolize and dominate all national
public services, and subjugate other ethnic groups in controlling resources and
revenues under a “Dinkocracy”
project.
The
Ancestral land in British English not SPLA English, it means inherited (belong
to) by established legal rules such Chief, patrimonial, hereditary, or
transmissible tradition. Pay attention to the active verbs. Based on this definition
it is false, illegal and crime for anyone to claim that Dinka should or have
right to grab lands in Equatoria, Bhar Al-Ghazal, Upper Nile or elsewhere where
they are not part of tradition of the locals inhabitants. forced migration and
relocation and movement does not make Jieng/Nuer member(s) of hereditary communities.
This is just sample logic requires no Ph.D., or rocket sciences. In sample English-
have traditional ties to land.
The
main problem here is ancestral land taken by force, abused of power, abused of of
organized forces uniform. Example. Prof. Taban Lo-Liyong’s first class piece of
land by Airport occupied by Jieng Gen. and threatening him- kill him. There are
many such cases pending in court. There is list compiled and documented all land
grabs crimes-time will come for justice to serve.
Question
for you to provide readers with rational- Why Abyei is called Ngok Dinka land? Ngok
Dinka land has equal meaning to Equatorian ancestral land. Why are you objecting
to Equatoria ancestral lands and accepted Ngok Dinka land? See 2011 South Sudan
Constitution- this is a legal document and The Man called 1988, Deng by Francis
M. Deng.
Another
Question: Why Lt. Gen. David Yayu keep
defecting? Is it not because of land grabs or what?
I
hope this provides you and those who think they entitle to grab lands by force
using the power of their authorities, and abuse of organized uniform in
Equatorain, Raja, and Chollo on false grounds.
There is some sense in this article because Equatorians are not the only group suffering in South Sudan. Others are also suffering even more than the Equatorians, but we cannot wait for them to begin do you know why? Everything starts in the mind and heart if your heart and mind are working 24/7 you have to start doing something to relieve yourself otherwise you may run crazy. Too much waiting isn't a good way in life. Let's aspire ahead toll
ReplyDeleteI like your response
ReplyDeleteWell articulated.,evidence placed on article or response r substantial amount to conviction before court of law or public opinion court if any. U really challenged d Dinka, Nuer or any South Sudanese who grabbed,participated in any form of corruption in the country. Well done yng bro. God bless u.
ReplyDeleteThey made good points and very intellectual argument. It seems equatorians hsve reached to the point of Reverend Martin Luther and Malcolm X.
ReplyDelete