Friday, December 3, 2010

The Kenya elections: when will the AU show leadership?

Since its inception in May 1963, the OAU and its successor, the present-day AU, has not demonstrated any meaningful leadership nor solved a single crisis in Africa. African leaders are known more as dictators than as true leaders seeking to better Africa. Part of the problem of the absence of leadership within the AU is not understanding the concept of 'servant leadership'. Robert Greenleaf explains "the great leader is first experienced as a servant to others", and that this simple fact is central to the leader's greatness.
According to Greenleaf, "a servant leader is one who is a servant first. It begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve others first, and to make sure that other people's highest priority needs are being served.
"The servant-leader isn't only a good speaker; he is also a good listener as he needs to hear the people's views and feel their pulse to determine the direction of the nation or organisation towards realisation of its goals."

Another primary reason why many African leaders fail to improve the state of their nations and their peoples is a lack of empathy, because "they live outside the people's world". It is very sad that these failures are evident within the AU. It is little wonder that Africa is suffering.
The AU leaders lack commitment to serving the greater consensual interest, to sharing power in decision-making, and encouraging ownership through the participation of African civil society.
They fail to recognise civil society has an important role to play in the achievement of democracy in Africa through, for instance, educating the public in the importance of democracy, fair elections, and good governance whose key components include accountability, legitimacy, democracy, equality, inclusiveness, transparency and rule of law.

African leaders accepted or inherited democracy from colonial masters without understanding the concept behind it. In essence, democracy, as applied in Africa, is tantamount to a 'copy and paste' of western democracy, lacking sensitivity to intrinsic domestic sociological beliefs, values and processes. As a result, these artificial applications of democracy remain vulnerable to the instinctive impulse of tribalism.

Ultimately, the absence of a thorough and systemic blending of fundamental African cultural elements into exercises in democracy in African countries will bear substantial collateral cost to Africa, especially through the highly-emotional election processes. Democracy in Africa is not an overnight event; but a process which requires time.
The lack of leadership within the AU has cost the many electors in Kenya their lives during the past days. Meanwhile, the AU has been slow to take the lead through established mechanisms to resolve the Kenyan elections dispute.

Only after the daunting reality of several hundred deaths in only a few days were envoys, including the current AU chair and president of Ghana, John Kufuor, dispatched to the region.
Kenya's election is a litmus test of peer-accountability and other vaunted mechanisms. Actions and results here bear substantial implications for upcoming elections in Zimbabwe, Angola, South Sudan and other African States.

What should be done regarding Kenya's election? The first step is that the AU should resolve disputes over the election result through the Disputes and Complaints Committee. The results must be reviewed, with all options put on the table including a recount to satisfy stakeholders' confidence in the AU.

Finally, the AU must seriously assess the legitimacy of Mwai Kibaki's claim to the presidency vis-a-vis mounting evidence indicating otherwise. The fact Kibaki had himself sworn in almost immediately after the results were announced is dubious at best.
Against a highly-charged background of electoral impropriety, the Kenya Election Commission (KEC) also falls into question for not allowing the statutory two weeks for complaints and disputes to be filed to insure fairness.

© Hüstin Läkü, Sr.
Ottawa, Canada.
Prize Letter: African Business, Feb, 2008 by Justin Laku

2 comments:

  1. Justin,

    Great article. I could not agree more with you.

    Please continue to push the servant leader and
    need-to-live-within-the-culture of the people aspects of this
    brief essay.

    While you wrote this for the A.U., it is equally applicable to
    most of the leadership in Sudan. If Southern Sudanese
    can/will/do accept the concept that they serve the people rather
    than the people serving them, great progress can be made.

    In His Service,

    ReplyDelete
  2. Congratulations for this blog.

    I suggest that you add a comment component to your articles to capture the resonance of shared ideas, lessons to learn and opportunities for improvement.
    Keep it up!

    ReplyDelete

Fraught Sudan poll imperils democracy

  Fraught Sudan poll imperils democracy By  Justin Laku Sudanese democracy is being killed by multiple assassins, writes Justun Laku. ...